beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis

At last the paper discusses and assesses how to what an extent Kings dream came true with self-elected sources as backrest for the asses. To further strengthen, the credibility of his argument and question the morality behind the war, he says, Since I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. 6 Effective Content Marketing Strategies You May Have Overlooked, Market Analysis Definition (With Explanation and Examples). In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audiences pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. Favorite Quote:What doesn't kill you only makes you stronger. In short, this makes the audience more inclined to listen to the rest of Martin Luther king Jr's speech, as well as setting the bottom line that the Vietnam War creates devastating problems for everyone. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. He does this when he writes, "It was a step that rocked the richest, most powerful nation to its foundations" (King 96-97). With an urgent tone, he repeats the phrase, we must speak (4), several times. King draws sympathy for his cause from the reader who sees the unjustness of the situation he and his followers are dealing with. Along with, and the almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam, First, Martin Luther King Jr. uses emotional appeals to persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust because it is unfairly killing the poor and its destroying the country. Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. (King). Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. StudyCorgi. Apart from highlighting the wicked nature of the war, King Jr 's speech also sets the urgency for protest. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. Luther starts off by explaining that Vietnam heavily takes away valuable money of the US. Acasestudy.com 2007-2019 All rights reserved. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. He also mentions emotional situations the readers probably cant even imagine. While his words clearly deliver his disappointment over the path American government had chosen, it also expresses a clear intention to not be with the wrong and instead listen to ones inner voice. Graduateway.com is owned and operated by Radioplus Experts Ltd Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? Luthers speech was a passionate rhetoric that preached his views about the future. In front of over 3000 people at the New York Riverside Church King preaches to a room filled with clergy and laymen concerned about the Vietnam. This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. match. King uses emotional words and descriptions to capture the audiences attention and convey the injustices caused by the Vietnam War. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). On August 28th, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr gave us one of one of the most rhetorically moving speeches ever given. We Will Write a Custom Case Study SpecificallyFor You For Only $13.90/page! This paper examines the conditions of the Afro-Americans lives from 1960-today with focus on education, work, income, police brutality and criminality. While his I Have a Dream speech is considered his best one, his other speeches too offer a glimpse of his powerful rhetoric and his art of persuasion. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesn't address their oppressor, the U.S. government. The line, For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent, demonstrates how King uses parallelism. In Hanoi are the men who led the nation to independence against the Japanese and the French, the men who sought membership in the French Commonwealth and were betrayed by the weakness of Paris and the willfulness of the colonial armies. Dr. King includes a brief, but poignant history of the war in Vietnam which is important because he needs to prove that he knows and understands the politics of the situation. He believed that the Vietnam War diverted money and attention from domestic programs created to aid the black poor and would benefit only the banks who fund wars and the industries that supply the war. For example, he says that if Americas soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read: Vietnam. King uses this metaphor to establish the potentially dreadful consequences of America continuing to fight the war. "The Fine Art of Baloney Detection" Essay by Carl Sagan. submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism. Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/, Rhetorical of Analysis of Martin Luther Kings, I Have a Dream Speech, Break, Break, Break by Alfred Lord Tennyson Analysis, Martin Luther King Jr.: A Civil Rights Activist Who Changed, Rhetorical Analysis Martin Luther King Jr. versus Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesnt address their oppressor, the U.S. government. Martin Luther King Jr proves to all throughout his speech Beyond Vietnam --- A Time to Break Silence that the Vietnam war was unjust by his use of emotional diction, the allusion of Jim crow, and repetition. His choice of words in the speech is meant to have a direct effect on the audience's psychology. King argues that all people are created equal and directly challenged the outdated and abhorrent views that upheld the false flag of racial superiority among White Americans. Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. He also says the war is further crippling the poor in the United States by sending a disproportional number of them to the front lines to die. King's criticism of the war as "broken and eviscerated," allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. He calls the situation some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. He efficiently uses the anecdote to tell how he has spoken with young men, telling them how violence will not solve their problems. Furthermore his speech did not. The irony is explicit in Kings words that the war is just an attempt to cover and hide the more pressing issues before America. Dr. Kings purpose is to make the church leaders he is speaking to aware that the time has come for them to speak out loudly in opposition of the war in Vietnam. Manacles of discrimination, Lonely island of poverty and Chains of discrimination paint a bleak picture of life as a minority in America, and contrasts phrases such as Bright day of justice and Sacred obligation which symbolize freedom. They all had the same goal, but took a different approach with their speeches, and how they would rally support to improve racial equality. In a sense, he dives right into the idea that it is unrealistic for them to find freedom in a region halfway across the world when they couldnt even find it in America. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. (King). So far we may have killed a million of them, mostly children (King). The speech deemed racial segregation to be an inhumane practice that subdivides society into groups that essentially alienate them from the true sense of humanity; which is brotherhood. For instance, he starts by stating the effects of the Vietnam War forced the American poverty program: "experiments, hopes, new beginnings." Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. King wants his audience. He then paints a picture of the suffering endured by Vietnam and tells how the United States has a long history of doing the wrong thing to this tiny country. In conclusion, Martin Luther King, Jr uses ethos, pathos, and logos, among other rhetorical devices, to support his argument that American policy in Vietnam was inconsistent with its treatment of African-Americans in the United States. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. He means to make people ask questions of themselves and ponder over the meaninglessness and uselessness of war and what would remain behind once the war was over. Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his views on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. In his speech, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr., uses appeals to emotion, appeals to credibility, and powerful diction to strengthen his argument and persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust. Martin Luther King Jr. disagreed with the way the war was being handled, and thought nonviolent demonstrations would be more efficient. Logos appeals to reasoning and argumentation by applying statistics, factual evidence, and data. Kings criticism of the war as broken and eviscerated, allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. To start, Dr. Kings use of metaphors allows his audience to understand his viewpoint better. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. He is disappointed in te church and his disappointment is worse because he feels so strongly for the church, as is evident through his tears. Martin Luther King, Jr indicates that he is seen as a figure of authority by the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King (MLK) was an activist and a minister who claimed that the war on Vietnam was wrong. War is expensive. In his second paragraph, he connects with his audience by saying we have been repeatedly faced, For instance, in the second paragraph of his speech, he says, I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor. The words silent, cruel, and manipulation speak out to an audience, especially for one that has faced hardship themselves in times of need. Nothing evokes a more emotional response than the image of children suffering or being killed. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence, During the 20th century, the Vietnam War had a profound impact on Americans, but there was a side of the story that was less known- voices from the poor. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. He also reminds the church leaders of something seemingly obvious that they may have lost sight of: the Father is deeply concerned especially for his suffering and helpless and outcast children (13). This special lyrical and parallel structure helped get his main points across and allows a large audience to understand simple but powerful words (Layfield) . King Jr delivered his "Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence" in 1967 in NewYork City. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam He strengthens his argument through his use of rhetorical questions and an anecdote. The persuasive techniques utilized by King Jr are aimed at making people think over the outcomes of Vietnam war and if it was not against Americas integrity. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes Americas involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. For instance, he does when he depicts the, Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. In this way, he tries to stress that even if we have progressed, we have grown nowhere better than the ancient barbarians that killed for fun. King was really able to speak to his audience by using evidence, reasoning, and a persuasive writing style throughout his speech. 838 Words Many people believed that America had no reason to interfere, Dr. King being one of those people. Therefore, to remain silent would truly be betrayal. Pathos is a method applied to represent an appeal to feelings and emotions in a speech and other various kinds of writing. 4 May. In this way, he appeals to the emotions of the audience and challenges the logic behind an unnecessary war. This quote causes the audience to realize the contradiction in the Vietnam war policy, making them less likely to accept. Comparing the Justice System during the 1960s to a corrupt bank allows the audience to connect to what Dr. King is saying. For example, in paragraph 7, King discusses the harsh reality of the war. His passionate tone flowed through these strategies, increasing their persuasive power on the people and encouraging them to follow/listen to his message on racial injustice. The audience felt empowered by the sentence alone. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. Later in his speech, King writes again using an advanced vocabulary to reinforce his academic background with, America would never be free or saved from itself until the descendants of its slaves were loosed completely from the shackles they still wear. By using the word shackles, the reader can easily create a vivid image in their mind of how restricted the poor must feel, and whether it be physically or mentally, they can understand how much the restrained are longing for a sense of freedom. The third section is King's call for change. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. But be assured that my tears have been tears of love (8). By showing his own emotions, King inspires compassion in the. Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, "in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village," helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). To achieve this, he used rhetorical strategies such as appeal to pathos and repetition. Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. In the speech, Martin Luther King specifically indicates that America needs to end the war with Vietnam. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Supplemental understanding of the topic including revealing main issues described in the particular theme; Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. Public Speech. King Jr makes a strong statement against war and his speech successfully evokes compassion and sympathy for the poor and the weak in both Vietnam and America. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. Thank you! He is using vivid language to describe the casualties; however, they are also supported by evidence, as he is using precise numbers in this part of the speech. In his argument, King mounts a multi-pronged attack on America's participation in the Vietnam war and also gains people's sympathy for the Vietnamese. Beyond Vietnam: A Rhetorical Analysis . Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". Society's punishments are small wounds compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Many of us have felt the anxiety to speak up against what we know is wrong. His first reasons are all about practicality. Kings main motive was to persuade people to see how war was destroying lives, society and economy and being silent meant being in approval of the war. StudyCorgi. For example, he writes vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will, drown your sisters and brothers and hated filled policemen even kill your brothers and sisters (3). Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. It also describes the Jim Crow laws and the busboy cot from 1955. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam", Key Ingredients to Being a Successful Student. Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and. report, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther Kings Beyond Vietnam: a Time to Break Silence. In a solemn tone, he talks about their crops being destroyed and their water being poisoned, presumably referring to Agent Orange. On April 4, 1967 at Riverside Church in New York, MLK delivered "Beyond Vietnam" , which created a different perspective on the Vietnam war, in which is a negative thing. If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence. In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break. The rhythm and frequent repetition are used to drive home his key points, stressing the importances of his goal. War was an inhuman and barbaric exercise and America's participation was not in human interest. He states, repeatedly, To begin, King uses figurative language in the first half of his speech to highlight the destructive nature of the war, strengthening his overall position. The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. Furthermore, such a vivid picture will linger permanently in the audiences mind, which will make them think about the terrible outcome in the future. King said, the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at homeWe were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. In this way, while he successfully draws a parallel between the struggles of Vietnamese people and that of the Americans, he also lays the foundation for the next stages of his argument. By expressing how much he believes in the American dream and a new dawn, it reassures people that even though there is little progress at a time, King will always fight not only for himself, but his family, friends, and all those who are not held to the same respect. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. They now also understand that the Vietnam War plays a bigger role in America than just the men gone to war, it affects others too, like them. He repeatedly stresses upon breaking the silence because in this situation being silent was a sin. To make his claims stand out and have a deeper impact, he uses instances from Vietnamese history to show the level of injustice faced by its people how war has destabilized them. By continuing well It allows them to imagine what might happen if America were to keep fighting in the war. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. In his speech on the meaninglessness of the Vietnam war and to persuade the audience to listen to its own conscience rather than to conform to the idea of war in the name of patriotism, King Jr draws from the realms of economy, society, polity as well as religion and philosophy. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words | 3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. Just like the people of America, the Vietnamese also have a right to live free on the lands of their fathers. In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready He does this by appealing to certain issues the public see as important, using irony, and using diction and tone in persuasive ways. Introduction Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence" argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam. Thank you! https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. As he notes towards the end of his speech, "If we will make the right choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood ". Perhaps the most convincing part of the speech is the emotional appeal. Using the approach, the context of the speech will be analyzed according to the classical cannon of rhetorical. His choice of diction and use of imagery help him deliver his point effectively in a manner that impresses both the audience's heart and mind. He applies ethos to establish credibility, pathos to appeal to emotions, and logos to support his claims with hard evidence. Martin Luther King Jr. Src: Pixabay Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. He also states, I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. 1. King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. Please enter the email address that you use to login to TeenInk.com, and we'll email you instructions to reset your password. The paper concludes that Kings dream have not come true, but, Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam. King was establishing his point that America was more troubled about healing and adjusting other countries, but would never invest the same in their own country. A lot of parts from Martin Luther Kings dream have come true, but it is still not all that is how King wanted it to be. At the heart of their concerns, this query has often loomed large and loud: Why are you speaking about the war, Dr. King? Why are you joining the voices of dissent?(King). The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. In Martin Luther King Jr's passionate speech about America's involvement in Vietnam, he manages to create a strong and compelling argument that America's involvement in unjust . Finally, as the speech comes to a close, King writes, If Americas soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read: Vietnam. King goes so far as to suggest that the war will bring America to its death if it continues overlooking the problems Americans are facing at home. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam.