ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 Solved: Cannot boot from UEFI USB - HP Support Community - 6634212 I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. Rik. Aporteus which is Arch Linux based version of Porteus , is best , fastest and greatest distro i ever met , it's fully modular , supports bleeding edge techs like zstd , have a tool to very easily compile and use latest version of released or RC kernel directly from kernel.org ( Kernel Builder ) , have a tool to generate daily fresh ISO so all the packages are daily and fresh ( Aporteus ISO Builder ) , you can have multi desktops on a ISO and on boot select whatever you like , it has naturally Copy to RAM feature with flag to copy specific modules only so linux run at huge speed , a lot of tools and softwares along side mini size ISO , and it use very very low ram and ISO size, You can generate ISO with whatever language you like to distro have. So I apologise for that. Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? What exactly is the problem? The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. My guesd is it does not. the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. Yes, I already understood my mistake. Ctrl+i to change boot mode of some ISOs to be more compatible Ctrl+w to use wimboot to boot Windows and WinPE ISOs (e.g. Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. Sorry for the late test. After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen: Yes ! 5. Ventoy 1.0.55: bypass Windows 11 requirements check during installation No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. Edit ISO - no UEFI - forums.ventoy.net In this case, only these distros that bootx64.efi was signed with MS's key can be booted.(e.g. I have a solution for this. Delete or rename the \EFI folder on the VTOYEFI partition 2 of the Ventoy drive. Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. Time-saving software and hardware expertise that helps 200M users yearly. By the way, this issue could be closed, couldn't it? GRUB mode fixed it! Go ahead and download Rufus from here. I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI privacy statement. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. The easiest thing to do if you don't have a UEFI-bootable Memtest86 ISO is to extract the \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.efi file and just copy that to your Ventoy drive. In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." privacy statement. When Secure Boot is enabled, BIOS boot (CSM) should not work at all, since it would completely defeat the purpose of only allowing signed executables to boot. if you want can you test this too :) | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. Option2: Use Ventoy's grub which is signed with MS key. I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. Keeping Ventoy and ISO files updated can help avoid any future booting issues with Ventoy. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. From the booted OS, they are then free to do whatever they want to the system. It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). I am just resuming my work on it. for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. You are receiving this because you commented. This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. However, I guess it should be possible to automatically enroll ALL needed keys to shim from grub module on the first boot (when the user enrolls my ENROLL_THIS_CERT_INTO_MOKMANAGER.crt) and handle unsigned efi binaries as a special case or just require to sign them with user-generated key? https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?t=4997. This is definitely what you want. . So any method that allows users to boot their media without having to explicitly disable Secure Boot can be seen as a nice thing to have even if it comes at the price of reducing the overall security of one's computer. Solved: UEFI boot cannot load Windows 10 image - Dell Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. Error description Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. Openbsd is based. If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI. Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso also boots fine in Legacy mode on IdeaPad 300 with Ventoy 1.0.57. If someone uses Ventoy with Secure Boot, then Ventoy should not green light UEFI bootloaders that don't comply with Secure Boot. It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI Reboot your computer and select ventoy-delete-key-1.-iso. Ventoy is open-source software that allows users to create ISO, WIM, IMG, VHS(x), and EFI files onto a bootable USB drive. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. Create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD(x)/EFI files using Ventoy @ventoy Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. 4. It is designed to protect a system against malicious code being loaded and executed early in the boot process, before the operating system has been loaded. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. It's the BIOS that decides the boot mode not Ventoy. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. Expect working results in 3 months maximum. I'll fix it. They boot from Ventoy just fine. ia32 . Ventoy I've already disabled secure boot. Do I still need to display a warning message? Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). Some questions about using KLV-Airedale - Page 4 - Puppy Linux How to Install Windows 11 to Old PC without UEFI and TPM Feedback is welcome If your tested hardware or image file is not listed here, please tell me and I will be glad to add it to the table here. try 1.0.09 beta1? This is also known as file-rolller. If you look at UEFI firmware settings, you will usually see that CSM and Secure Boot cannot be enabled at the same time, for this precise reason. But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". The Ultimate Linux USB : r/linuxmasterrace - reddit For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT The program can be used to created bootable USB media from a variety of image formats, including ISO, WIM, IMG and VHD. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and unsigned kernel still can not be booted. downloaded from: http://old-dos.ru/dl.php?id=15030. Boots, but cannot find root device. https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists. ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! Boot net installer and install Debian. 3. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. @ValdikSS, I'm not seeing much being debated, when the link you point to appears to indicate that pretty much everybody is in agreement that loading unsigned kernels from GRUB, in a Secure Boot environment, is a bug (hence why it was reported as such). You need to make the ISO UEFI64 bootable. check manjaro-gnome, not working. Won't it be annoying? I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. The MISO_EFI partition contains only 1 folder called "efi" and another folder in it called "boot" which contains a single file called "bootx64.efi.". PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. Windows 10 32bit yes, but i try with rufus, yumi, winsetuptousb, its okay. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. Latest Ventoy release introduces experimental IMG format support Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. I have absolutely no problem with letting the user choose if they want to run a bootloader that failed Secure Boot validation, and I think this might be the better way to do it indeed. 8 Mb. I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. Preventing malicious programs is not the task of secure boot. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi Newbie. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. its existence because of the context of the error message. And that is the right thing to do. Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. edited edited edited edited Sign up for free . Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. All the .efi files may not be booted. Ubuntu.iso). They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. Hi, HDClone can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode for legacy BIOS, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. You can grab latest ISO files here : Still having issues? Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. Users can update Ventoy by installing the latest version or using VentoyU, a Ventoy updater utility. You signed in with another tab or window. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2020.0_p20200527.iso - 4 GB, avg_arl_cdi_all_120_160420a12074.iso - 178 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200419.n.0.iso - 1.80 GB 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB However, I'm not sure whether chainloading of shims are allowed, and how it would work if you try to load for example Ubuntu when you already have Fedora's shim loaded. Thanks. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Acer nitro 5 windows 10 ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. sharafat.pages.dev And, unfortunately, with Ventoy as it stands, this whole trust mechanism is indeed broken, because you can take an official Windows installation ISO, insert a super malicious UEFI bootloader (that performs a Windows installation while also installing malware) and, even if users have Secure Boot enabled (and added Ventoy in Mok manager), they will not be alerted at all that they are running a malicious bootloader, whereas this is the whole point of Secure Boot! Remove Ventoy secure boot key. In other words, that there might exist other software that might be used to force the door open is irrelevant. Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. 4. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? We talk about secure boot, not secure system. I am not using a grub external menu. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. GRUB2, from my experiences does this automatically. Its ok. debes activar modo legacy en el bios-uefi For secure boot please refer Secure Boot . I'm not talking about CSM. Of course , Added. Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but. Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB 1. Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all The virtual machine cannot boot. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? Just some of my thoughts: If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. SecureBoot - Debian Wiki orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB Also ZFS is really good. can u test ? ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. privacy statement. . Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. Is there any progress about secure boot support? If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. That is just to make sure it has really written the whole Ventoy install onto the usb stick. After install, the 1st larger partition is empty, and no files or directories in it. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. However the solution is not perfect enough. You can put a file with name .ventoyignore in the specific directory. You signed in with another tab or window. Already have an account? Tested ISO: https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso. My guess is it does not. All of these security things are there to mitigate risks. When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. Download ventoy-delete-key-1..iso and copy it to the Ventoy USB drive. This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). 1: The Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool is not compatible with USB 3.0. @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content.