zizek peterson debate transcript zizek peterson debate transcript

"almost all ideas are wrong". Which Way, Raskolnikov? iek v. Peterson - The California Review Really? I think a simple overview of the situation points in the opposite direction. Capitalism threatens the commons due to its The event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian Slavoj iek, considering Happiness: Capitalism vs Marxism in Toronto. it's made of many idea nuggets only tenuously linked to one other although He said that belief in God can legitimize the terror of those who claim to act on behalf of God. They both wanted the same thing: capitalism with regulation, which is what every sane person wants. Are you also ready to affirm that Hitler was our enemy because his story was not heard? Competencies for what? How Jordan Peterson Lost His 'Debate' Against Slavoj Zizek - The Federalist Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. divinity) that could impose meaning from above, and how it's impossible to go Source: www.the-sun.com. Another summary of the Peterson/iek debate - Pharyngula But if violence perpetuated in the name of an idea is supposed to disqualify the idea, then more people have died in the name of communism and nationalism than any other idea. 25 Debate quotes that show Jordan Peterson doesn't know what - Medium Bonus: Zizek on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zizek on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Jordan Peterson-Slavoj iek debate was good for something Andray Domise: Debate has its place in debunking bad actors and their ideas, but it only works when the participants have. That the debate will be live-streamed and more than 1,400 people have already dropped $14.95 for. Peterson Zizek Debate Transcript.docx - Happiness: It will be certain only it will be too late, and I am well aware of the temptation to engage in precipitous extrapolations. Key Agile Release Train stakeholders, including Business Owners, What can occur as a result of not having an Innovation and Planning Iteration? Peterson also supported the capitalist system, claiming that the business know-how and leadership skills of the capitalists add economic value to the system. cordial and respectful, something I really appreciated. increasingly erratic in the rest of the debates. Peterson, I was interested to learn they'd have a debate. of the Soviet Union would be pretty important. He too finished his remarks with a critique of political correctness, which he described as the world of impotence that masks pure defeat. [2][16] The monologue itself was less focused as it touched many topics and things like cultural liberalism, Nazism, Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and xenophobia, among others;[2][15] and against the expectation of the debate format did not defend Marxism. Can we even imagine how the fragile balance of our earth functions and in what unpredictable ways geo-engineering can disturb it? Peterson stated that although capitalism produces inequalities, it is not like in other systems, or even parts of the world compared to the so-called Western civilization as it also produces wealth, seen in statistical data about the economic growth and reduction of poverty worldwide, providing an easier possibility to achieve happiness. Take what is perhaps the ultimate rogue state Congo. Press J to jump to the feed. A warm welcome to all of you here this evening, both those here in the, theatre in Toronto and those following online. We will probably slide towards apocalypse, he said. This one is from the Guardian. Both Zizek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debate we hope will transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame of happiness of human flourishing itself. [19] Harrison Fluss and Sam Miller of Jacobin reported that Peterson made many factual errors, such as misunderstanding the labour theory of value, incorrectly associating Marx broadly with identity politics, and denying the existence of a Marxist philosophy of nature. It's also entertaining to watch, and I suspect this was the mode in which most He sees the rejections of some systemic failures of capitalism onto external First of all it's much shorter than Peterson Vs Harris. [15][16] On the example of China, he tried to connect happiness, capitalism, and Marxism as well criticize China itself[16] and asserted that "less hierarchical, more egalitarian social structure would stand to produce great amounts of this auxiliary happiness-runoff". The very premise of tonight's event is that we all participate in the life of, thought. Tonight, "philosopher" Slavoj iek will debate "psychologist" Jordan Peterson in Toronto, ostensibly on the subject of Capitalism vs. Marxism. please join me in welcoming to the stage Doctor Slavoj iek and Doctor Jordan Peterson. [3], During an event at the Cambridge Union in November 2018, iek stated that Peterson used "pseudo-scientific[4] evidence" (3:40). Web november 12, 2022 advertisement the nigerian factcheckers . Jordan Peterson itching to take on Slavoj Zizek - 'any time, any place' -", "Slavoj Zizek vs. Jordan Peterson: Marxist gewinnt philosophenduell", "Happiness is watching a brawl between iconoclastic philosophers", "Has Jordan Peterson finally gone too far? Hitler was one of the greatest storytellers of the 20th century. Thanks for you work. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM35zlrE01k. Studies suggest that meditation can quiet the restless brain. The threat of ecological catastrophe, the consequence of new techno-scientific developments, especially in biogenetics, and new forms of apartheid. I will correct more when I get more time but I need to get back to work. Conservative thinkers claim that the origin of our crisis is the loss of our reliance on some transcendent divinity. We live in one and the same world which is more and more interconnected. Who could? If you look closely, you will say that state plays today a more important role precisely in the richest capitalist economics. Next point. Second on how modernity is characterized by the absence of authority (and Zizek will suit up for Team M and Peterson will wear the "C" on his hometown jersey. Get counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday. They play the victim as much as their enemies. Again, even if there if the reported incidents with the refugees there are great problems, I admit it even if all these reports are true, the popularist story about them is a lie. Credits for this section should go to the hard work of Xiao Ouyang and Shunji Ukai //, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUhYdqB2Jh7CU5Le0XgktKaoXQmnTdbv0-_kE5BQL6Q/edit?usp=sharing, Thank you so much for this, I had trouble understanding Zizek's pronunciation of the book on Christ's Atheism on the cross. Remember Pauls words from Galatians There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer male and female in Christ. You can find a transcript of it here. But, nonetheless, deeply divided. Book deals for political prisoners still in jail. EL DEBATE DEL SIGLO: Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson Disfrut la discusin filosfica entre Michel Onfay y Alain Badiou , pesos pesados del pensamiento alternativo, y qued satisfecho. I have a hard time understanding Zizek, and am admittedly completely out of my depth when it comes to philosophy and Marxism and all the nitty gritty. Because the left doesn't have its own house in order", "Is 'cultural Marxism' really taking over universities? In his turn, the self-proclaimed pessimist Zizek didnt always stick the larger economic topics, and did not want to be called communist. Peterson debate Transcript? : r/zizek - reddit But, it is instantly clear how this self-denigration brings a profit of its own. So, here I think I know its provocative to call this a plea for communism, I do it a little bit to provoke things but what is needed is nonetheless in all these fears I claim ecology, digital control, unity of the world a capitalist market which does great things, I admit it, has to be somehow limited, regulated and so on. a.Teams are iterating, but the system is not b.Conflict and disagreement on processes and practices are difficult to, Program Increment (PI) Planning is a major event that requires preparation, coordination, and communication. In Peterson's defense, he did manage to stay much closer to the actual topic of the debate, while Zizek jumped wildly between a dizzying number of subjects. IEK V/S PETERSON: Anlisis del "debate del siglo". The Petersoniek debate, officially titled Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, was a debate between the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson (a clinical psychologist and critic of Marxism) and the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj iek (a psychoanalyst and Hegelian) on the relationship between Marxism, capitalism, and happiness. The twentieth century left was defined by its opposition to the truth fundamental tendencies of modernity: the reign of capital with its aggressive market competition, the authoritarian bureaucratic state power. If we are left to ourselves, if everything is historically conditioned and relative, then there is nothing preventing us from indulging in our lowest tendencies. Die Analyse dieser Figur findet mit starkem Bezug zur Etablierung You're currently offline; make sure to connect for latest articles. One interesting point Zizek and Peterson both seemed to agree on is the opinion that humans arent strictly rational beings. So it seems to me likely we will see tonight not only deep differences, but also surprising agreement on deep questions. He seemed, in person, quite gentle. The Hidden Argument in the Zizek/Peterson Debate, From a - Medium The Master and His Emissary: A Conversation with Dr. Iain McGilchrist Transcript . They dont mention communism to legitimise their rule, they prefer the old Confucian notion of a harmonious society. Weeks before the debate began, I already saw many similarities between Zizek and Peterson, such as their views on struggle, their stance against political correctness, and the problem on ideology. This largely contrasts Peterson's viewpoint who admittedly has never used that term to refer in any way to the associated conspiracy theory, but only to raise critique about cultural phenomena that are, according to him, directly associated with postmodern thought. Peterson is his usual intensely-driven professorial self, which I personally If we learned anything from psychoanalysis, its that we humans are very creative in sabotaging our pursuit of happiness. [15], Later in the debate, iek agreed with Peterson's opening analysis and called for regulation and limitation of the market for capitalism to reduce the risk of natural and social disasters. He doesn't do much to defend Communism Blackwood. is dead and he never amended his manifesto that I know of. Equality can also mean and thats the equality I advocate creating the space for as many as possible individuals to develop their different potentials. Error type: "Forbidden". vastly different backgrounds). There are two teams, each consisting of two or three speakers. MeToo is all too often a genuine protest filtered through resentment. In spite of protests here and there, we will probably continue to slide towards some kind of apocalypse, awaiting large catastrophes to awaken us. Neither can face the reality or the future. She observed in a recent critical note that in the years since the movement began it deployed an unwavering obsession with the perpetrators. Slavoj iek, psychoanalytic philosopher, cultural critic, and Hegelian Marxist. As the debate ostensibly revolved around comparing capitalism to Marxism, Peterson spent the majority of his 30-minute introduction assailing The Communist Manifesto, in fact coming up with 10 reasons against it. "If you have a good theory, forget about the reality. [15], At the beginning of his opening monologue, iek noted avoidance to participate in the debate in the role of an opponent and that both were victims of left liberals. Tonight, "philosopher" Slavoj iek will debate "psychologist" Jordan Peterson in Toronto, ostensibly on the subject of Capitalism vs. Marxism. [9], Writing for Current Affairs, Benjamin Studebaker criticized both Peterson and iek, calling the debate "one of the most pathetic displays in the history of intellectuals arguing with each other in public". What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and - Vice by its protagonists. It's hard not to crack up when out of time for They didnt understand what is happening to them with military defeat, economic crisis, what they perceived as moral decay, and so on. [2] He asserted that it is wrong to perceive history only through a lens of class struggle, there is no exclusively "good" proletariat and "bad" bourgeoisie, such identity politics is prone to authoritarian manipulation, and that in his view people do not climb the social hierarchies only by taking advantage of others. knowledgeable about communism. Web nov 14, 2022. [Scattered Audience applause and cheers]Both Doctor iek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debatewe hopewill transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame Peterson, in his opening remarks, noted that scalped tickets were selling at higher prices than the Maple Leafs playoff game happening on the other side of town. It is often claimed that true or not that religion makes some otherwise bad people do good things. It was in this opening argument that Zizek effectively won the debate to the extent it was a debate at all. Next point one should stop blaming hedonist egotism for our woes. strongest point. There was a livestream which people could pay to access that peaked at around 6,000 viewers. Zizek's opening statement is probably the most interesting part of the debate. A big deal, with huge numbers, and really very little underneath. google, pretty well on the center-right, and pretty badly on the left (broadly). Once traditional authority loses its substantial power, it is not possible to return to it. I've talked to (which, unfortunately were more fanboys than rigorous What people are saying about Jordan Peterson's upcoming showdown with